CRITERIA 2 : TEACHING LEARNING AND EVALUATION (350)
Metric No.
Key Indicator- 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile (40)
Relevant Proofs
2.1.1
Average Enrolment percentage (Average of last five years) (20)
2.1.1.2. Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years
Student List
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
Bengaluru City University
Bangalore University
2.1.2
Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy) during the last five years (20)
View
Declaration
Student List
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
Metric No.
Key Indicator- 2.2. Catering to Student Diversity (50)
Relevant Proofs
2.2.1
The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners (30)
View
2.2.2
Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) (20)
Staff list: 2020-21
Student List 2020-21
Declaration letter
Metric No.
Key Indicator- 2.3. Teaching- Learning Process (50)
Relevant Proofs
2.3.1
Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences (20)
Experiential Learning
Community Services
Participative Learning
2.3.2
Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process. (15)
ERP Manual
2.3.3
Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year ) (15)
Mentor Mentee List
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
Circulars: Mentor Mentee
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
Metric No.
Key Indicator- 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (60)
Relevant Proofs
2.4.1
Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years (20)
Appointment Orders
Sanctioned Post Order copies
View
2.4.2
Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D./ D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Superspeciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count) (20)
Ph.D Certificates
2.4.2
Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year in number of years) (20)
Metric No.
Key Indicator- 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms (30)
Relevant Proofs
2.5.1
Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode (15)
University Guidelines
Internal Assessment
Blue books
2.5.2
Mechanism to deal with internal/external examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient (15)
Metric No.
Key Indicator- 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes (60)
Relevant Proofs
2.6.1
Program outcomes, program specific outcomes and course outcomes for all programs offered by the Institution are stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students (15)
Outcomes
2.6.2
Attainment of program outcomes, program specific outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution (15)
2.6.3
Average pass percentage of Students during last five years (30)
Results Year wise
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
Results Annual Report
Metric No.
Key Indicator- 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (60)
Relevant Proofs
2.7.1
Online Student Satisfaction Survey regarding to teaching learning process.(60)
Criteria-1
Criteria-2
Criteria-3
Criteria-4
Criteria-5
Criteria-6
Criteria-7